The tuition fees vote

I am disappointed that the plans to raise the tuition fees cap to up to £9,000 were approved by MPs, despite opposition from myself and many other Lib Dem colleagues.

I appreciate that the Lib Dems in Government had little room for manoeuvre, given the economic mess we’re in and given that the two other main parties went into the May election promising to retain fees and supporting the Browne review that was set up to increase them . But I am against fee rises that are likely to put off some people from going to university, which is why I voted against and why I’ll continue to speak out on this issue – I was on the BBC last week to highlight my concerns.

Looking ahead, I will continue to work for the removal of barriers to the benefits of a university education being put in the way of those on lower incomes. Universities should not be allowed to get away with hiking fees to the highest possible level.

Fees are only supposed to be above £6,000 in “exceptional circumstances”. I’ll be crying foul if that becomes widespread. I’ll also keep pressing the case for maintenance grants to be as generous as possible to allow wider access to university.

Thanks to increases in maintenance grants, an increase in the threshold to £21,000 before a graduate pays anything back  and a more progressive repayment system that Lib Dems in Government fought for and won, the 25% lowest paid graduates will pay less in future than now. That’s welcome. But I want even greater state help so that as many graduates as possible are left with as little debt as possible.

As the economic situation improves, that’s something I’ll be pushing strongly for in parliament.

3 responses to “The tuition fees vote

  1. Interesting that you said on the BBC you believe some of your Lib Dem colleagues only voted in favour of the rise because they were concerned about the coalition appearing to be weak.

    That’s quite damning on your colleagues, isn’t it? It means you’re acknowledging they have no principles, no appreciation for promises they made in the course of a democratic process and then subsequently broke (big time). If their voting records in Parliament are going to be influenced by those kinds of considerations rather than a consideration of the actual policy ramifications, then god help us all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s