Rebel with a good cause.

I have no regrets about rebelling on plans to reduce benefits for people in homes that are under-occupied. Most debate on these reforms have centred around the Cap. I support a cap in principle, as unlimited benefits makes finding work impossible, as do all three of the major parties, but is important that the detail of these plans are properly scrutinised to avoid unintended consequences.

I’m sure that the Government doesn’t want to force a pensioner couple out of the home they have lived in for 30 years and brought their family up once the kids grow up and leave.

On a related issue, on Tuesday, I chaired a meeting of the MPs from the North West on behalf of the Housing Federation on how to get the best out of housing related support. This is a wide ranging support network for the vulnerable in society such as the elderly and victims of domestic abuse.

This is an important service. A 2009 report by Capgemin commissioned by the DCLG  showed that the £1.6 billion invested in housing related support schemes actually saves £3.4 billion by reducing the needs for extra services.

Even though Councils run these services, the MP’s of all party’s present promised to lobby for improvements to these important services.


One response to “Rebel with a good cause.

  1. If people are being paid more than £26000 in benefits then they must have qualified for these benefits. There is no justification for capping benefits, but then on this issue, like many others you are in line with Tory and Labour thinking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s