In Praise of the Manchester Evening News’s Child Poverty Campaign

John is praising the Manchester Evening News for highlighting the failures of the last government and this in ending child poverty

The definition of poverty, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies,  is those earning under 60% of the median household earnings. In the latest figures, the median figure is £414 per week, or £21, 528 per year. That means that anyone with a household income of under £12,917 family was officially “in poverty”.

We have a duty to protect our nation’s children and help them to fulfil their potential. Recent reports on the state of child poverty in the UK are disheartening, showing that 2.3 million children are living in poverty in the UK.

Any child living in poverty is too many, but Manchester has the highest percentage of children in poverty nationwide outside London. In 2009, 41,600 lived in relative poverty, about 2 in 5 of all Manchester children. That is almost double the national average.

The Manchester Evening News have done an important job of highlighting the situation, as they did under the last government,  and has been running a campaign to raise awareness for child poverty in the city. I’d like to do my part by spreading the word about what has been done to alleviate poverty and the current Government’s plans to do even more.

From 1999 to 2010, despite throwing a lot of money at the problem – £150 Billion in tax credits – the previous Government failed to meet its 2010 target of lowering the number of children in poverty to 1.7 million. While there was a downward trend during this period, it mostly benefitted the workless poor. Those who were employed, but still suffering in poverty, saw less benefit.

In 2011, the Coalition Government has set out a strategy that focused on the root causes of poverty: educational failure, worklessness, family breakdown, severe debt; and health issues, such as alcohol and drug addiction. Under Labour from 1999-2010, we saw a drop of 800,000 children in poverty, still 0.9 million short of their 2010 target. But the Coalition’s actions are making a difference – in just one year, from 2010-2011, 300,000 children were lifted out of poverty. A higher proportion that under the last government. Most of these are children from the working poor.

That is why I support plans to raise the tax threshold to £10,ooo, and should raise it to £13,000, so that no-one in poverty pays income tax. That is why I opposed Labour abolition of the 10p tax rate

I am far from satisfied – we are still 600,000 short of Labour’s 2010 target and far from the goal of “eradicating child poverty”. There is no easy fix for poverty, but we need agencies, the government, and the people working together to form viable solutions.

2 responses to “In Praise of the Manchester Evening News’s Child Poverty Campaign

  1. “the Coalition’s actions are making a difference – in just one year, from 2010-2011, 300,000 children were lifted out of poverty.”

    That’s pretty misleading. What happened was that average incomes fell – they actually fell in cash terms, not just relative to prices – so the threshhold used to define poverty also fell. In other words, many – perhaps most – of these children who you say were “lifted out of poverty” were actually worse off in real terms. It was just that the technical measure of “poverty” had changed because society as a whole was worse off.

    In reality, the IFS has predicted a large increase in the number of children living in poverty – from 2.5 million in 2010 to 3.1 million in 2013. I suppose the Liberal Democrats will get around that by adopting a different measure of poverty when the time comes:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-15242103

  2. Hi Chris,

    The technical measure is not mine, and has stayed the same, but you raise an interesting point about definitions of poverty. What I have tried to do in the blog is to say that this is a difficult issue which governments of all shades have had difficult getting to grips with, and that the MEN is doing a service by raising the issue.

    John

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s