West Coast Main Line: Change the rules to include past performance before re-run

In my 15 years as a Councillor and MP, there is one golden rule. Councillors , MP’s and Ministers don’t get involved in the details of the awarding of contracts. They don’t check the maths. They don’t ask if inflation or VAT is included. They set the criteria, presume the Civic Servants know what they are doing, and then ratify the decision.

So it is very disappointing that the Government are having to re-run this decision following mistakes made by civil servants, mistakes which will cost the Tax payer millions of pounds.

The Department for Transport announced today that two independent reviews will be launched. One will examine how the competition went wrong, and what lessons can be learned. This will be led by Sam Laidlaw, Centrica chief executive, and Ed Smith, the former PwC strategy chairman, who will produce an initial report by the end of the month.

The other review will examine the wider franchise programme. It’s due to report by the end of December and will be led by Richard Brown, Eurostar chairman.

I welcome these enquiries. They should stop these mistakes being made again.

I have long argued that the franchise rules implemented by the last Labour government were flawed. They did not take into account past performance or even public satisfaction.   Past performance should be taken into account when deciding whether a contract is awarded, and proper independent scrutiny should be made before a contract is awarded.

The government has a small window of opportunity. They should change the rules to make the awarding of contracts more transparent and less dependent on who offers the most money. And they should do it before the West Coast Main Line franchise is re-run.

3 responses to “West Coast Main Line: Change the rules to include past performance before re-run

  1. Why should monopolies be awarded at all?

    Why not allow any train operator to offer a service on any line, as long as a regular service is properly time-tabled and as long as “specials” can be slotted in between regular services? Of course, the rolling stock would have to meet certain basic standards of construction, brakes and so on, but that should not be a problem.

    If passengers prefer to use one company over another, they should have that choice. If one company offers a free shoe-shine service to attract passengers to “executive class” seats, there should be no block to another company offering free blow-jobs.

  2. Pingback: West Coast Main Line: Time to make the right decision | John Leech MP·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s